The World of Color is Still Looking for Its Wonderful

by Joe Stevano, contributing writer
Advertisement

Back when World of Color first opened at Disney California Adventure, Adrienne Vincent-Phoenix noted the following in her review of the show "The Mostly Wonderful World of Color":

"Several minutes into the new World of Color show at Disney California Adventure park, the Genie from Aladdin appears and says, "I don't think you quite realize what you've got here." That line pretty well sums up my feelings of Disney's new nighttime spectacular: it's a good, solid show—probably the best thing to come to DCA—but its potential is even better."

It has been five years, and although there have been changes—new tags at the beginning or the end, a Christmas variation, and a grad-nite version—World of Color – Celebrate, the new show that debuted as part of Disneyland's diamond anniversary celebration, was their first opportunity to go back to the drawing board and really show us that they "realize what [they've] got here."

First off, the show they are selling and the show that is delivered are wildly different. So different, that I actually went back to the website to check that I didn't somehow misread the description of the show.

From the website:

"Filled with never-before-seen surprises and dazzling special effects, and hosted by Neil Patrick Harris and the one-and-only Mickey Mouse, it's an unforgettable opportunity to follow along on Walt's incredible journey of imagination—from his earliest creations, to his very first visions for The Happiest Place on Earth, to today's Disney magic… and beyond!"

They even reinforce this message with the opening of the show. World of Color – Celebrate opens with a slight modification of the final lyric from the original song The Wonderful World of Color: "The funny world, The sunny world, The wonderful world of Walt Disney." The foremost spray screen displays Tinker Bell and the text, "Laughter is timeless, imagination has no age, and dreams are forever." The text is not in quotes and is not attributed to Walt Disney, even though they are his words. Then we see our hosts Neil Patrick Harris and Mickey Mouse, who tell us that we are here to celebrate the wonderful world of Walt Disney.

The show starts to go wrong from here. Neil Patrick Harris sings a new song as he performs "Magic" with the help of lasers. We see a lot of Neil Patrick Harris. This is no understatement; we see more of Neil Patrick Harris than we do of Walt Disney. We learn that Walt had many dreams and he saw a lot of them come true. We get a short montage of classic Disney animated movies that are not in any particular order: Dumbo, Pinocchio, Peter Pan, The Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh, Bambi, Alice in Wonderland, and Cinderella. OK, I think, maybe we are back on track. I mean, it would be amazing to see those wonderful panoramic Sleeping Beauty backgrounds on those huge water screens. The clips are out of order for absolutely no reason, but clearly they will be back in order when they talk about Walt's animated features.

The next sequence has video of Neil Patrick Harris (no joke) telling us that Mickey Mouse was near and dear to Walt's heart. We see a video clip of Walt telling us how it was all started with a mouse and we get a Mickey Mouse montage starting with "Steamboat Willie" then "Plane Crazy." We jump into color with "The Band Concert," "Thru the Mirror," and "The Brave Little Tailor." The music over a portion of this is "Mickey Mouse Club March," which is strange since the clips we are watching are from cartoon shorts from the 1930s and the song was from The Mickey Mouse Club, which aired starting in 1955. Then there are a few clips from the current batch of Mickey Mouse shorts that were produced in the last couple of years.

All good stuff, to be sure. There is nothing really new here. We have seen all the clips before. Even though Mickey starred in over 125 cartoon shorts, nothing new was presented in this show. I am mostly okay with that, until the end of this sequence where once again we get clips from Sorcerer's Apprentice. Is it not possible to have a video show without this clip? And it is a long clip, quite possibly longer than the clip used in Fantasmic. Can we all agree that we can put clips from this sequence from Fantasia back in the vault until the day comes that Fantasmic is retired? But I know that is my pet peeve.

Next sequence. More video of Neil Patrick Harris (seriously). He tells us about Walt's first animated feature, Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs. We get a clip of the movie and then, as if to tell us "See! There is a reason for the Cathay Circle," there is a new animation that pans around the Theater and pushes in through the doors for a montage of clips from the movie over the song "Some Day My Prince Will Come." It is really quite nice, if heavy handed. As soon as this song is over, you should leave; Save yourself. Go home and watch the lovely new Disneyland 60th commercials. Trust me.

Neil Patrick Harris tells us, "The rest, we know, is history." We get another quote, this time attributed to Walt Disney: "Animation can explain… whatever the mind of man can conceive," and then we go off the rails. We get The Little Mermaid, Finding Nemo, The Jungle Book, Tangled, The Princess and the Frog, and Toy Story 3,

What? Wait, weren't there movies in between there? The rest is history? Isn't this a salute to that history? The show just jumps over all that and rushes straight to the past 25 years. Then there are clips of Bambi, The Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh, more Snow White and the Seven Dwarves, 101 Dalmatians, Lady and the Tramp, Wreck it Ralph, Big Hero 6, Monsters, Inc., Fantasia's Sorcerer's Apprentice (again!), Beauty and the Beast, Up, Dumbo, Peter Pan, Tarzan, The Rescuers, Toy Story, The Incredibles, Lilo and Stitch, Cars, Aladdin, Tangled, more Bambi, Finding Nemo, The Lion King, and Frozen—in that order, which is to say, no order at all.

Now, I don't have a problem with the newer features being represented, but this is as if someone took all the clips they had from the prior World of Color show, put them into iTunes, hit shuffle, and that was the order used. We get some Pixar films, but not all of them. Where are Sleeping Beauty, Saludos Amigos, and Robin Hood to name a few? However, this sequence is not over! There is a villains montage with 101 Dalmatians, Aladdin, The Little Mermaid, The Lion King, Toy Story, Wreck it Ralph, Sleeping Beauty, Toy Story 2, Peter Pan, Frozen, Sleeping Beauty, more Wreck it Ralph and Toy Story, and more and more, on and on, with no order or purpose. These are all quick clips, not clever character moments. Moreover, why is there a villians sequence at all? Isn't this about the "Dream" that Walt had about making animated movies?

The worst part of all of these sequences is that the full potential of the World of Color fountain system is wasted; the wide water screen is barely used. The majority of the video is only on the center screen, and although there are fountains on either side, you don't even notice them. There is projection on both California Screamin' and Mickey's Fun Wheel, but many times it is the same video as what is on the center screen.

Now we are certainly on a train to crazy town and the next stop is "Let It Go" from Frozen. Not even kidding a little bit. "Let It Go." Now, if Frozen did not already have a sing-a-long, and if Frozen was not part of the Paint the Night parade, maybe (and that is a slim maybe) maybe "Let It Go" could be part of a song montage of great Disney songs. But this is the only full song in the show. If this allowed them to show off some amazing water effects, then maybe it would redeem this overused anthem. However, throughout the entire song the animation is essentially straight from the movie—even when there is nothing interesting to look at—and the fountains don't do anything special.

There is a little back and forth like the old sequence from Aladdin with the Genie and some laser effects, but it feels like a sequence created for the previous show that was never dropped in, now resurrected and repurposed. There are fog jets in the audience, but they feel distracting and out of place rather than cute.

Our trip through crazy town continues with more Neil Patrick Harris video. Now we are on to Walt's dream of Disneyland, with Walt's opening day speech and some nice park video. Then we move to a strange Neil Patrick Harris clip of him in a Dumbo vehicle. Not an actual Dumbo vehicle, but a fake one shot in front of a blue screen.

From Dumbo we move to the Tiki Room, which is a jump from opening day to 1963 or so, but it was a big achievement in entertainment, so fine. However, the material is all new animation, not footage from the actual attraction. It is a shame it is not still standing, across the esplanade in the same exact place it was built, because then you could have gone over there and filmed the real show. Or, better yet, you could show clips and pictures from the 1960s of the attraction being worked on or of Walt actually enjoying the show instead of clips of Neil Patrick Harris singing along to the song.

Next we are on to Splash Mountain because clearly that would be the next attraction you would feature when giving a salute to Walt Disney and his dream of a family amusement park. Not Matterhorn, Carousel of Progress, or Great Moments with Mr. Lincoln, but more green screen of Neil Patrick Harris in fake attraction vehicles and new animation.

Next up? Radiator Springs Racers! Then Pirates of the Caribbean, Haunted Mansion, and "it's a small world." This is some of the worst animation I have seen Disney do in a long time (and I have seen Mickey and the Magical Map) continues with more Neil Patrick Harris in fake attraction vehicles. I wasn't kidding about there being a lot of Neil Patrick Harris. He has more screen time here than any episode of How I Met Your Mother.

Then just when you thought it could not possibly get worse, there's Star Tours. This sequence allows them to use the big fireball effect. Why? Because. But the worst part is that the clips from Star Tours mix into clips from the latest Star Wars movie trailer. They literally mix Walt's dream of Disneyland with a movie trailer for a franchise that the company purchased three years ago. And then we end with another fireball.

Neil Patrick Harris returns, so it must be time for another sequence, which is essentially a long version of the ad that is currently running on television. The song that accompanies it is "Forever Young," originally written and first performed by Bob Dylan, and here sung by Christina Perri. The song is great and archive video of what we are supposed to believe is Disneyland is shown—strange that the kids are wearing Magic Bands. Although the song and video are great, they clearly didn't know what to do with the fountains as they are basically doing nothing the entire time.

Neil Patrick Harris is back once again to tell us how much Disneyland has meant to him and sing the closing song over another video montage of Walt Disney and Disneyland and movies and anything else they had at their fingertips when they edited the sequence. Literally. Random castles, attractions, Epcot, a cruise ship, more Star Wars, a Marvel shield… on and on. They wrap up the show with a short video clip of Walt and a quote.

Disney had a real opportunity to do something really special with this show; they started with a clean slate and could have really shown off what can be done with water, projection, lasers, and music. There are some issues to overcome: the early footage of Walt is all black and white, and that appears to be difficult to project well. However there is a very short clip of Walt changing from black and white to color that is just thrown away near the end of the show that would have been an amazing transition piece to color. They had an amazing body of work to pull from and they focus on very little of it. No live action movies are represented aside from Star Wars. No Television. Nothing from the World's Fair.

Then, given the opportunity to show off where the company has gone through today, they fail as well. They give us a ton of video of Neil Patrick Harris when we really only need to hear him to move the story along. And worst of all, they make so little use of the fountains as to make them a prop to the actual story. It is a sad excuse of a salute to Walt Disney as told by poor story tellers who made no use of the technology available to them.

Let's hope the World of Color finds its Wonderful someday.

 

Comments

  1. By wwwdrich

    While I haven't seen the new World of Color show yet, what you say matches my impressions of the new 60th fireworks as well. They open with the a comment about Disneyland's 60 years of history then proceed to present a 15 minute overview of the history of Disney animation. Don't get me wrong, I have nothing against animation (I work in the industry after all), but the only thing that has anything to do with Disneyland is the opening and closing. Even leaving aside the fact that the new show seems to be designed for those with ADD (look at the sky, look at the castle, look at main street, look at the Matterhorn, now look at the sky again, repeat); it just doesn't deliver on the promise made in the opening and closing comments.

    My first comment after seeing them was "why do they even bother with the fireworks?" There is so much else going on that I hardly paid any attention to them.

    And don't get me started on the "kiss goodnight" comment in the closing. If they fireworks are the kiss goodnight, why is the park open for another three hours after they finish?

  2. By DisneyGator

    "And further more, don't walk on my lawn!!!"

    While I agree that NPH was a horrible choice to host this show, and they compound this problem by making him the focus over and over and over.... I don't think the show is as bad as you make it out to be. I thought the various montages were good, touched on some of my favorite films, and were even heart-warming at times. And what's with the slamming of all the Sorcerer Mickey stuff? I'm guessing you were leading the charge to remove the Hat at Hollywood Studios in Orlando???

    Anyway, I think the original WOC was the better version. But that has a lot to do with NPH and his lame, dry, unfunny, unclever delivery. The rest of show was enjoyable - it just kept getting interrupted with Harris.

  3. By olegc

    expecting literal views and videos from all of the attractions and parts of walt's life I don't think is very realistic. It doesn;t allow the freedom to create the right image or the right timing for what's needed in the video segments. While I agree with some of your points (too much NPH, too much Frozen), the reality is they make park entertainment for the largest masses - which also means the most common denominators. That usual means what makes most people say "oh yeah". I love live action like the rest of the geeked-out Disney fan base but I think the Park's entertainment group understands that historic - and most current - will get them the largest possible group of people to know what they are watching. Computer who wore tennis shoes, world's greatest athlete, apple dumpling gang, Blackbeard's Ghost, Swiss Family Robinson, geez even Old Yeller won't spark a majority of guests' memories.

    It also seemed in a couple of spots the author lamented the fact that we were getting rehashed clips from existing media. I don't see where you can create all brand new stuff for these shows. Brand new combinations, sure, but default brand new segments may not be effective from a budget standpoint.

    I was initially on the same side as others that World of Color (and Fireworks) did not translate to what was advertised. Then, after thinking about it and watching the shows again, two things emerged. 1) that yes Disney entertainment and advertising takes many liberties with descriptions - where "celebrating" something could mean having a single pic on the wall and putting music to it but mostly 2) Disney parks themselves, in their entertainment, rides, shows, etc. are not necessarily supposed to be literal vehicles for the movies or stories you've seen. To me - and its been stated by a few Imagineers over the years - Disneyland is a place where you create your own memories with the characters you love based on the experiences you have in the park. This includes reliving moments from movies in show or in attractions that marry what you are seeing now with what you remember in the film (or TV show) you watched. If it was literal, why go to the Park? Why not just watch it on TV.

    And - btw - Ifor the commenter on fireworks). Kiss Goodnight is a historical, traditional element of Disneyland. The advent of midnight closures is a modern did not exist originally and in fact many guests today leave the park right after the fireworks end. It does mark the end of their day - so they are given that Kiss Goodnight. During parts of the year that are not summer, in fact the park closes right after fireworks.

    I liked WoC regular (with the Brave segment) better than this show with NPH but parts of it are good. I can see, though, the authors view based on their comments.

  4. By sediment

    Could someone add Joe's name as the author, instead of saying "Contributing Writer"?

  5. By Jimbo996

    It seems to me like they use too many video clips from both animated movies and live action movies; however this problem also exists in Fantasmic. None of these shows are fully original, meaning they are a creation in itself with unique music and animation. It's more like a show that uses special effects, water effects, and technology to showcase Disney's vast catalog in new mediums. Take Frozen or Star Wars for example. They don't need to be in World of Color, but its like why not show them on the big water screen and see how they look (in an excited kids way). After one viewing, its no big deal. This leads me to say Disney should not be pounding into our heads the accomplishments of Walt Disney. We shouldn't be watching the montages of Disney's greatest accomplishments because we really don't care. We want to be entertained with the newest creations, yet this new show feels forced. Don't tell us to enjoy what we obviously already enjoy.

  6. By Blacksheep Uncle

    is this wrong that this was the first thing that came to mind?
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=11&v=xinezYShFWY

  7. By kwlundy

    I'm confused about your 'It is a shame it is not still standing' comment about the Tiki Room?

  8. By ahecht

    Quote Originally Posted by kwlundy View Post
    I'm confused about your 'It is a shame it is not still standing' comment about the Tiki Room?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcasm

  9. By kwlundy

    Quote Originally Posted by ahecht View Post

    Yeah, realized this soon after I posted my comment. Thanks for being nice about it, ahecht...

  10. By danyoung

    I can't comment with as much detail as the author did, as I've only seen the new show once. But I had no problem with Neil Patrick Harris as the host, and didn't for a second feel that he was featured too much. I also didn't feel like I was wishing for more water fountain action - it was a show, and I followed along with the story as it was being told. And I'm huge fan of Idina Menzel, so I totally loved and was moved by Let It Go being presented in a format that I'd never seen before.

    In short, I thought this was a really terrific show. Perhaps there's a better story to be told, but the story they're telling with this show is a wonderfully crafted one. So I agree with the above sentiment being attributed to the article's author - "YOU KIDS GET OFF MY LAWN!!!"

  11. By corona

    Thanks for reinforcing my decision to to use the 1-park tickets I have only at Disneyland Park.

  12. By MovieBoy

    Quote Originally Posted by wwwdrich View Post
    While I haven't seen the new World of Color show yet, what you say matches my impressions of the new 60th fireworks as well. They open with the a comment about Disneyland's 60 years of history then proceed to present a 15 minute overview of the history of Disney animation. Don't get me wrong, I have nothing against animation (I work in the industry after all), but the only thing that has anything to do with Disneyland is the opening and closing. Even leaving aside the fact that the new show seems to be designed for those with ADD (look at the sky, look at the castle, look at main street, look at the Matterhorn, now look at the sky again, repeat); it just doesn't deliver on the promise made in the opening and closing comments.

    My first comment after seeing them was "why do they even bother with the fireworks?" There is so much else going on that I hardly paid any attention to them.
    I agree completely. They attempted to take Dreams from Paris Disneyland and force it into Disneyland. Complete fail.

    Quote Originally Posted by DisneyGator View Post
    "And further more, don't walk on my lawn!!!"
    This that know me know that I am pretty positive about most of the entertainment shows at the parks. As the rest of your comment notes, the original show was much better, and that is not saying much as THAT show was not all that great either.

    Quote Originally Posted by olegc View Post
    expecting literal views and videos from all of the attractions and parts of walt's life I don't think is very realistic. It doesn;t allow the freedom to create the right image or the right timing for what's needed in the video segments. While I agree with some of your points (too much NPH, too much Frozen), the reality is they make park entertainment for the largest masses - which also means the most common denominators. That usual means what makes most people say "oh yeah". I love live action like the rest of the geeked-out Disney fan base but I think the Park's entertainment group understands that historic - and most current - will get them the largest possible group of people to know what they are watching. Computer who wore tennis shoes, world's greatest athlete, apple dumpling gang, Blackbeard's Ghost, Swiss Family Robinson, geez even Old Yeller won't spark a majority of guests' memories.

    It also seemed in a couple of spots the author lamented the fact that we were getting rehashed clips from existing media. I don't see where you can create all brand new stuff for these shows. Brand new combinations, sure, but default brand new segments may not be effective from a budget standpoint.

    This is a classic example of marketing promising one thing and entertainment delivering another. I can promise you that a really great show could have been created based on what they advertised. I'm not looking for a geek based show here, just quality entertainment. Don't repackage existing clips, re-wrap them in NPH segments, and slap a Frozen song in it and tell me it is an all new original show created for the 60th anniversary. That is not OK.

  13. By olegc

    Wasn't original WoC full of clips? Doesn't magical and remember use existing music, clips, or Shell combos for shows? Isn't it all derivative?

  14. By MovieBoy

    Quote Originally Posted by olegc View Post
    Wasn't original WoC full of clips? Doesn't magical and remember use existing music, clips, or Shell combos for shows? Isn't it all derivative?

    To some extent, yes. But being derivative is no excuse for being lazy with telling a story and entertaining.

    The original WoC had interesting transitions and interesting clips (think the Wall-E sequence blending into the wallpaper from Toy Story, or the forest sprite from Fantasia 2000). May times there was JUST water and lights being thrown into the air in new and interesting ways with music playing (Much of the PotC sequence was like this). There was an attempt to entertain with the use of water, music and video.

    Magical used new arrangements of existing Disney classic songs (Baby Mine and Chim Chim Cher-ee) and Remember used audio clips from attractions set to some of the best fireworks Disneyland had ever seen (the Haunted Mansion segment was amazing). Both made excellent use of audio and fireworks to entertain and pay tribute to classic Disney moments.

    This new show does not measure up to any of these entertainment offerings.

  15. By olegc

    Those are good points.

  16. Discuss this article on MousePad.